Remember how the woke and super-concerned and awfully caring and, most of all, ignorant (I use this word in its technical sense) censors at YouTube, Twitter and all the rest quashed accounts that said myocarditis was likely a prominent side effect of the mRNA viruses?
This has all the hallmarks of a plan to eliminate millions of people and thereby eliminate a country or a culture, which makes sense if you have millions more from other countries and cultures lined up and ready to replace them.
I am neither a physician nor a statistician, and I never heard of myocarditis until the current plague. This article seems to assert that in a group of normal unvaccinated people 7.5% will develop myocarditis in a randomly chosen week. If this is true, the real miracle here is that I have never heard of the ailment, because if this goes on week after week sooner or later, mostly sooner, everyone including me will have contracted it. Can this possibly be correct? Wouldn’t we all have noticed this?
Yes, you have that impression because of my bad writing. That's a relative number conditional on the number of people and shots. The paper, and I, compared relative risks. The "population risk" is something much lower. Which is why you haven't heard of it.
Miles e Blake says ,”This has all the hallmarks of a plan to eliminate millions of people and thereby eliminate a country or a culture.” I say that the sentence “ That's a relative number conditional on the number of people and shots,” while it is in the form of a sentence in English, conveys no meaning to me at least.
The stats are in the form of relative difference between vexed and unvexxed. They do not represent "unconditional" risk. Which is not high but non-zero, and therefore still important when the number of shots are huge, as they were here.
The exact numbers can be had in the paper, which is open access.
This has all the hallmarks of a plan to eliminate millions of people and thereby eliminate a country or a culture, which makes sense if you have millions more from other countries and cultures lined up and ready to replace them.
I am neither a physician nor a statistician, and I never heard of myocarditis until the current plague. This article seems to assert that in a group of normal unvaccinated people 7.5% will develop myocarditis in a randomly chosen week. If this is true, the real miracle here is that I have never heard of the ailment, because if this goes on week after week sooner or later, mostly sooner, everyone including me will have contracted it. Can this possibly be correct? Wouldn’t we all have noticed this?
Yes, you have that impression because of my bad writing. That's a relative number conditional on the number of people and shots. The paper, and I, compared relative risks. The "population risk" is something much lower. Which is why you haven't heard of it.
Miles e Blake says ,”This has all the hallmarks of a plan to eliminate millions of people and thereby eliminate a country or a culture.” I say that the sentence “ That's a relative number conditional on the number of people and shots,” while it is in the form of a sentence in English, conveys no meaning to me at least.
The stats are in the form of relative difference between vexed and unvexxed. They do not represent "unconditional" risk. Which is not high but non-zero, and therefore still important when the number of shots are huge, as they were here.
The exact numbers can be had in the paper, which is open access.