"Everybody in science knows what confirmation bias is, but everybody also believes it always happens to the other guy." I've written something like this a few times since 2018, here and there, and the response I get is often coupled with arguments ad verecundiam: "I have a masters degree in statistics and of course AGW is real, and you are a high school drop out, obviously is a waste of time to make you understand how bad you are."
Scientists cannot admit that many laymen in the general public are better informed than the PhDs because they stopped listening to officialist media and went to research directly the primary assumptions. The young PhDs seem to be completely sheltered from reality and live comfortably in the madhouse of google and wickedpedia.
Your article hits the nail squarely. Whenever I run into a true believer in the whole "climate change" religion, my first question to them is, "Can you provide to me a source of reproducible proof that validates the claims made by any single Climate Change Model?" I'm probably formulating my question wrong, but so far, no proofs, but lots of blank looks.
Pretty good, thank you!
"Everybody in science knows what confirmation bias is, but everybody also believes it always happens to the other guy." I've written something like this a few times since 2018, here and there, and the response I get is often coupled with arguments ad verecundiam: "I have a masters degree in statistics and of course AGW is real, and you are a high school drop out, obviously is a waste of time to make you understand how bad you are."
Scientists cannot admit that many laymen in the general public are better informed than the PhDs because they stopped listening to officialist media and went to research directly the primary assumptions. The young PhDs seem to be completely sheltered from reality and live comfortably in the madhouse of google and wickedpedia.
Your article hits the nail squarely. Whenever I run into a true believer in the whole "climate change" religion, my first question to them is, "Can you provide to me a source of reproducible proof that validates the claims made by any single Climate Change Model?" I'm probably formulating my question wrong, but so far, no proofs, but lots of blank looks.