Introduction Some time ago I wrote about The science of fake news. I must confess, I find this misinformation discourse thoroughly boring. Why? Because it reveals the most plebeian of human characteristics: power, money, fame. The misinformation discourse noxiously smells of a power-grab made by the academic expertocracy increasingly lacking in authority of their own making.
My man! So I’m in understanding you correctly, we may be on the same lines saying that the math from the holocaust DOES NOT add up - which I agree with and plan to write an article about. You may enjoy this article: https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/lies-not-discussed-within-the-truth
Well, no, that was NOT the specific claim (but now they may be forced to change the lie). Anyone and everyone knows about the 6M. And the fact that these signs show the change means that they are lying often as they get proved as liars. But good try.
Good essay, marred a bit by the Holocaust statements. No doubt, Jews were killed in great numbers in WW2, but so were millions of Poles, Soviet POWs, Belorussians, Russians, Ukrainians, etc. As someone whose curiosity about this event has been recently piqued by the organized calumny, imprisonment, and silencing of legitimate historians trying to conduct honest investigation into this matter, I have serious doubts now about the Hollywood version of the Holocaust.
We just witnessed how doctors and scientists were cowed into silence after observing colleagues speaking out against the Covid lies being shouted down, slurred, and destroyed. Are historians any different?
Attempts to include the millions of others murdered by the Germans in WW2 under the rubric of the Holocaust are actively quashed. Google: Professor Norman Davies/ Lucy Dawidowicz/ Stanford.
Victims hold the whip hand in today's world. It would be beneficial to be the Alpha Victim of all time.
Unfortunately the guest author appears to have directly used the string “pregnant people” from the inline reference link under the word ‘thalidomide’ which also uses the politically correct phrase:
Facts or misfacts don't matter. What matters is WHO said the fact. Everything said by Correct People is a command. Everything said by Incorrect People is a crime, EVEN WHEN both are saying exactly the same fact or misfact.
Hey William, you should definitely check this out: the article "Signaling the Trustworthiness of Science," co-authored by none other than Richard Sever in 2019. When I first saw the title, I thought I was reading something from The Babylon Bee!
Cool beans. Let's see what else the experts have cooked up lately... "global boiling"... "sex assigned at birth"... "two weeks to stop the spread"... "biden isn't senile"... "white supremacy is the greatest domestic terror threat"... "all the hallmarks of Russian disinformation"... "the smoking gun could be a mushroom cloud"... Boy they've been pretty busy haven't they.
honestly though, how can the statement “the Covid vaccine saved millions of lives” be proven in light of the fact they didn’t work. the best case scenario is that the original 2 shot does conferred immunity for only a few months.
it seems to make the statement that they saved millions would require massive amounts of comparative data. has anyone published anything showing that the vaxx saved millions..?
I completely agree with you. I personally don’t know a single person who died from Covid including elderly and immune compromised individuals, vaccinated or unvaccinated. We just have no idea how any person would react to getting COVID. I thought I was suffering from allergies when I tested positive for it.
William/Jaap - I enjoyed this article and thanks for the explanation between MISINFORMATION and DISINFORMATION.
I would argue that in the examples provided (Holocaust, Vaccines, election), we have a lot of DISINFORMATION occurring — which is “factual information used in a way to paint a specific perspective.” Essentially the practice of Menticide: https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/democide-and-menticide
Thanks for this article and I’m looking to write more on this subjects thanks to this inspiration here today.
“Disturbingly, there are many examples of severe delayed adverse drug reactions. It took five years for the connection to be made between thalidomide taken by pregnant people and the impact on their children.“
The an author has unwittingly fallen into one of their disinformation traps by referring to “pregnant people”. In reality as I understand it, only pregnant women give birth, regardless of how the so-called elites try brainwash us.
The very illegality of questioning and the fear which some people have of drawing the ire of a certain group tends to render protestations about the reality and immorality of doubting a certain alleged set of events sound something much less than totally sincere.
Regardless, the Expertocracy is not known for its promotions of obvious moral truths, even to make rhetorical use of them by utilizing the undesirability of their denial. There are plenty they might more effectively have used if the rhetorical intent was really to connect denial of their Official Truths with stupidity and immorality. Promotion of torturous animal sacrifice, perhaps. “Holocaust denial,” on the other hand, is connected with being regarded publicly as a subhuman fit to be swiftly disposed of. The rhetorical intent was fear, not embarrassment or guilt. It’s usually what they rely on, as we all know.
Does a certain set of alleged events being put in the same list (first, even) as Official Truths That Cannot Be Denied On Pain Of Deprivation, Ostracization, And Imprisonment (which are false) — a list promulgated by inveterate liars, who agree denial of those alleged events deserves the same punishment as denial of Official Truths (which are false) — cast any shadow of doubt on any part of those alleged events? We may never know.
“The competing interest paragraph on the authors is quite revealing and, prophetically, not reprinted on the article’s pdf.” A “competing interest” is called a conflict of interest when used in most contexts, and sometimes subjects the recipient to sanctions by licensing authorities. Is the use of misleading euphemisms a type of misinformation? Asking for a friend.
Also, one of the authors claims to have done “unpaid consulting” for Google and Meta. Unpaid? Really? Corporations with a market cap of over a trillion dollars compensate their consultants handsomely. I’m taking bets that this “unpaid consulting” had significant undeclared benefits of some kind to the author. Any takers?
That, or his consulting work wasn’t real work and he’s just trying to puff up his resume, which would explain why it was unpaid. Probably more like he had lunch with a manager at Google or Meta that one time.
ALL LIES OF THE SYNAGOGUE OF LIES WILL BE EXPOSED!
THE WAY THE TRUTH AND THE LIFE ONLY - THE ONE AND ONLY INCARNATION OF GOD ALMIGHTY AND SHEPHERD AND SAVIOUR THE LORD JESUS CHRIST AND THE HOLY SPIRIT FOREVER AND EVER - AMEN HALLELU-YAH - SOLI DEO GLORIA!
As for the Holocaust, the math is a real problem. Simply check out the changing Auschwitz signs and still come up with 6million.
Then, understand that the Nuremberg Trials used torture, lies about human skin lampshades, shrunken heads, human soap, etc to prosecute people.
Its ok that I am "immoral" for questioning obvious lies. I wish more people were truthful enough to do the same.
My man! So I’m in understanding you correctly, we may be on the same lines saying that the math from the holocaust DOES NOT add up - which I agree with and plan to write an article about. You may enjoy this article: https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/lies-not-discussed-within-the-truth
Franklin,
This might help:
https://substack.com/profile/91945971-abuse-productions/note/c-58753420
This might help to
https://nefahotep.substack.com/p/adolf-hitler-british-agent-part-1
I don't see anything about the numbers there. I wonder why hotep believes the jew lies about Adolf?
ANYONE with an expectation to get a "one sentence gold platter answer" to all his questions ... has an insurmountable uphill struggle before him!
SOLI DEO GLORIA!
I was very direct about Auschwitz supposed death numbers and yet the entire piece you shared had nothing about the numbers. So, what is your point?
You can also try
From JFK to 9/11 - Everything is a rich man's trick
The specific claim is that 1 million people died in the camps.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zyklon_B
The rest because of the general effects of war (disease, famine, crossfire).
The six-million number is total deaths, and is more of a marketing term than anything else.
Well, no, that was NOT the specific claim (but now they may be forced to change the lie). Anyone and everyone knows about the 6M. And the fact that these signs show the change means that they are lying often as they get proved as liars. But good try.
https://substack.com/profile/91945971-abuse-productions/note/c-58753420
Good essay, marred a bit by the Holocaust statements. No doubt, Jews were killed in great numbers in WW2, but so were millions of Poles, Soviet POWs, Belorussians, Russians, Ukrainians, etc. As someone whose curiosity about this event has been recently piqued by the organized calumny, imprisonment, and silencing of legitimate historians trying to conduct honest investigation into this matter, I have serious doubts now about the Hollywood version of the Holocaust.
We just witnessed how doctors and scientists were cowed into silence after observing colleagues speaking out against the Covid lies being shouted down, slurred, and destroyed. Are historians any different?
Attempts to include the millions of others murdered by the Germans in WW2 under the rubric of the Holocaust are actively quashed. Google: Professor Norman Davies/ Lucy Dawidowicz/ Stanford.
Victims hold the whip hand in today's world. It would be beneficial to be the Alpha Victim of all time.
Finally, here's an interesting article about the Holocaust by Ron Unz:https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-holocaust-denial/
Another worthwhile dive into it...
From JFK to 9/11 - Everything is a rich man's trick
You really used “pregnant people.”
Unfortunately the guest author appears to have directly used the string “pregnant people” from the inline reference link under the word ‘thalidomide’ which also uses the politically correct phrase:
https://www.sciencemuseum.org.uk/objects-and-stories/medicine/thalidomide
The experts agree that men are women, bigot!
Facts or misfacts don't matter. What matters is WHO said the fact. Everything said by Correct People is a command. Everything said by Incorrect People is a crime, EVEN WHEN both are saying exactly the same fact or misfact.
Hey William, you should definitely check this out: the article "Signaling the Trustworthiness of Science," co-authored by none other than Richard Sever in 2019. When I first saw the title, I thought I was reading something from The Babylon Bee!
https://www.pnas.org/doi/epdf/10.1073/pnas.1913039116
Cool beans. Let's see what else the experts have cooked up lately... "global boiling"... "sex assigned at birth"... "two weeks to stop the spread"... "biden isn't senile"... "white supremacy is the greatest domestic terror threat"... "all the hallmarks of Russian disinformation"... "the smoking gun could be a mushroom cloud"... Boy they've been pretty busy haven't they.
"You cannot lie about the size of your penis, after your pants are down"
: ancient Chinese saying
Well THE SYNAGOGUE OF MAKE BELIEVE/SATAN can ... so it believes. Using tools of smoke and mirrors for millennia.
honestly though, how can the statement “the Covid vaccine saved millions of lives” be proven in light of the fact they didn’t work. the best case scenario is that the original 2 shot does conferred immunity for only a few months.
it seems to make the statement that they saved millions would require massive amounts of comparative data. has anyone published anything showing that the vaxx saved millions..?
I completely agree with you. I personally don’t know a single person who died from Covid including elderly and immune compromised individuals, vaccinated or unvaccinated. We just have no idea how any person would react to getting COVID. I thought I was suffering from allergies when I tested positive for it.
William/Jaap - I enjoyed this article and thanks for the explanation between MISINFORMATION and DISINFORMATION.
I would argue that in the examples provided (Holocaust, Vaccines, election), we have a lot of DISINFORMATION occurring — which is “factual information used in a way to paint a specific perspective.” Essentially the practice of Menticide: https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/democide-and-menticide
Thanks for this article and I’m looking to write more on this subjects thanks to this inspiration here today.
On any given subject there is
- one (1) capital-T Truth
- this Truth is knowable in its entirety
- our experts know this Truth
This is religious dogma in a nutshell.
“Disturbingly, there are many examples of severe delayed adverse drug reactions. It took five years for the connection to be made between thalidomide taken by pregnant people and the impact on their children.“
The an author has unwittingly fallen into one of their disinformation traps by referring to “pregnant people”. In reality as I understand it, only pregnant women give birth, regardless of how the so-called elites try brainwash us.
Germ@r Rud0lf’s book the H****t Encyclopedia included things that really surprised me.
Mostly first hand information from trials, invoices, paperwork etc.
As he says:
Is asking questions a crime?
If you develop doubts, isn’t the only way to get rid of these doubts by asking questions?
Every other historical issue is debated as a matter of course, but influential pressure groups have made this an exception.
(I found him via Tim Kelly’s Our Interesting Times podcast - Episode 443)
Science and research today is best described in the folktale The Emperor’s New Clothes.
The very illegality of questioning and the fear which some people have of drawing the ire of a certain group tends to render protestations about the reality and immorality of doubting a certain alleged set of events sound something much less than totally sincere.
Regardless, the Expertocracy is not known for its promotions of obvious moral truths, even to make rhetorical use of them by utilizing the undesirability of their denial. There are plenty they might more effectively have used if the rhetorical intent was really to connect denial of their Official Truths with stupidity and immorality. Promotion of torturous animal sacrifice, perhaps. “Holocaust denial,” on the other hand, is connected with being regarded publicly as a subhuman fit to be swiftly disposed of. The rhetorical intent was fear, not embarrassment or guilt. It’s usually what they rely on, as we all know.
Does a certain set of alleged events being put in the same list (first, even) as Official Truths That Cannot Be Denied On Pain Of Deprivation, Ostracization, And Imprisonment (which are false) — a list promulgated by inveterate liars, who agree denial of those alleged events deserves the same punishment as denial of Official Truths (which are false) — cast any shadow of doubt on any part of those alleged events? We may never know.
“The competing interest paragraph on the authors is quite revealing and, prophetically, not reprinted on the article’s pdf.” A “competing interest” is called a conflict of interest when used in most contexts, and sometimes subjects the recipient to sanctions by licensing authorities. Is the use of misleading euphemisms a type of misinformation? Asking for a friend.
Also, one of the authors claims to have done “unpaid consulting” for Google and Meta. Unpaid? Really? Corporations with a market cap of over a trillion dollars compensate their consultants handsomely. I’m taking bets that this “unpaid consulting” had significant undeclared benefits of some kind to the author. Any takers?
That, or his consulting work wasn’t real work and he’s just trying to puff up his resume, which would explain why it was unpaid. Probably more like he had lunch with a manager at Google or Meta that one time.
Anyone curious should have a look at this - AND MANY MANY MORE - piece, in order to understand what we really know
https://nefahotep.substack.com/p/adolf-hitler-british-agent-part-1
ALL LIES OF THE SYNAGOGUE OF LIES WILL BE EXPOSED!
THE WAY THE TRUTH AND THE LIFE ONLY - THE ONE AND ONLY INCARNATION OF GOD ALMIGHTY AND SHEPHERD AND SAVIOUR THE LORD JESUS CHRIST AND THE HOLY SPIRIT FOREVER AND EVER - AMEN HALLELU-YAH - SOLI DEO GLORIA!