I don't know about vax-magnetism, but I have had personal experience with this phenomenon. Forks and spoons, always food laden, are powerfully attracted to my face.
And the deception was quite egregious. And clearly coordinated. Does anyone remember the Trusted News Initiative? How about the way the fact checkers would only fact check certain claims, and would do so deceptively, never quite addressing the real issue nor dispositively disproving it. Or if a claim was squarely disproven, such claim would be a hypertechnically defined strawman, such as the way the lab leak claim was always shot down with the rebuttal "there is no evidence covid was an intentionally released bioweapon." Who said anything about it being intentionally released? I am just wondering if it was lab made, but please, do tell me more about what was not happening. Such a rebuttal seemed to betray guilty knowledge, like the way a kid with guilty knowledge might answer the question "what have you been doing Johnny" with the response "not eating cookies."
Unfortunately, I've come to the conclusion that covid truths can be reliably approximated by what the Trust and Safety teams addressed versus ignored. When they started chattering about how they weren't eating the freshly baked oatmeal raisin cookies, you knew with certainty that you needed to pay attention to cookies. Maybe not the oatmeal raisin cookies, but something funny is going on with the cookies so you best pay attention because you are getting close to the target. Likewise, the fact they just ignored claims about the egg salad sandwiches was a decent sign you could too, especially if you already thought it was a stupid claim. None of this conclusively proves anything, of course, but are instead signs for directing your focus and attention.
And so I don't quite know what to do with the magnetic arm theory. I think its dumb and implausible, but it sure got decent attention from the censors, which suggests to me there is some kernel of truth in that claim somewhere that they are trying to protect from scrutiny.
Another analogy applies and is most commonly seen with the baffling rise in sudden and unexpected deaths. You are playing hide and go seek with your toddler. She barely manages to get her upper half under the bed. Her legs are prominently sticking out. So you put on a masterclass of avoiding the obvious, and systematically avoid looking at the most obvious location as you narrate your fruitless search to increasingly loud giggles: "is abby under the lampshade? Is she in the underwear drawer? I wonder if Abby is hiding on the ceiling?" I'm convinced our rulers are doing this with us, which also suggests they think the people are stupid and stand in a parent / child relationship with them, or worse, master / livestock relationship.
This dynamic about the CDC's tactics causing the "distrust" disease they seek to cure through information control is spot on.
My theory I developed over the last three years is that official deception causes conspiracy theories. Because people sense when they are being lied to. But knowing that "A" is a lie does not really help one know the truth. The best you can conclude is that "A" is not true, so literally almost anything is possible (except A) and so people are forced to guess. And this need to speculate about what is actually happening is limited by each person's tendency towards neuroticism, their intelligence, their knowledge, their sophistication, and their imagination. And so obviously some people have quite vivid imaginations. In any event, I've come to conclude that the proliferation of conspiracy theories, or crazy making, is a symptom of systemic deception. And the felt need of the government to prospectively combat disinformation suggests it intended to deceive.
Psychopaths don't want trust. They want mechanistic obedience. They break up all patterns of logic and periodicity and expectation and anticipation. Rules change constantly, and each new rule must be obeyed instantly, for an unknown period until the next rule stomps down. There are no facts, only commands.
If the regime says that vaccines cause spoons to stick to arms, then they cause spoons to stick to arms. 2 plus 2 is 5, and if you think otherwise you are as insane as Winston and we must fix you.
I don't know about vax-magnetism, but I have had personal experience with this phenomenon. Forks and spoons, always food laden, are powerfully attracted to my face.
Weird.
Ascribe not to conspiracy what incompetence and cumulative malice can explain. The results are the same, but the latter is more likely.
And the deception was quite egregious. And clearly coordinated. Does anyone remember the Trusted News Initiative? How about the way the fact checkers would only fact check certain claims, and would do so deceptively, never quite addressing the real issue nor dispositively disproving it. Or if a claim was squarely disproven, such claim would be a hypertechnically defined strawman, such as the way the lab leak claim was always shot down with the rebuttal "there is no evidence covid was an intentionally released bioweapon." Who said anything about it being intentionally released? I am just wondering if it was lab made, but please, do tell me more about what was not happening. Such a rebuttal seemed to betray guilty knowledge, like the way a kid with guilty knowledge might answer the question "what have you been doing Johnny" with the response "not eating cookies."
Unfortunately, I've come to the conclusion that covid truths can be reliably approximated by what the Trust and Safety teams addressed versus ignored. When they started chattering about how they weren't eating the freshly baked oatmeal raisin cookies, you knew with certainty that you needed to pay attention to cookies. Maybe not the oatmeal raisin cookies, but something funny is going on with the cookies so you best pay attention because you are getting close to the target. Likewise, the fact they just ignored claims about the egg salad sandwiches was a decent sign you could too, especially if you already thought it was a stupid claim. None of this conclusively proves anything, of course, but are instead signs for directing your focus and attention.
And so I don't quite know what to do with the magnetic arm theory. I think its dumb and implausible, but it sure got decent attention from the censors, which suggests to me there is some kernel of truth in that claim somewhere that they are trying to protect from scrutiny.
Another analogy applies and is most commonly seen with the baffling rise in sudden and unexpected deaths. You are playing hide and go seek with your toddler. She barely manages to get her upper half under the bed. Her legs are prominently sticking out. So you put on a masterclass of avoiding the obvious, and systematically avoid looking at the most obvious location as you narrate your fruitless search to increasingly loud giggles: "is abby under the lampshade? Is she in the underwear drawer? I wonder if Abby is hiding on the ceiling?" I'm convinced our rulers are doing this with us, which also suggests they think the people are stupid and stand in a parent / child relationship with them, or worse, master / livestock relationship.
This dynamic about the CDC's tactics causing the "distrust" disease they seek to cure through information control is spot on.
My theory I developed over the last three years is that official deception causes conspiracy theories. Because people sense when they are being lied to. But knowing that "A" is a lie does not really help one know the truth. The best you can conclude is that "A" is not true, so literally almost anything is possible (except A) and so people are forced to guess. And this need to speculate about what is actually happening is limited by each person's tendency towards neuroticism, their intelligence, their knowledge, their sophistication, and their imagination. And so obviously some people have quite vivid imaginations. In any event, I've come to conclude that the proliferation of conspiracy theories, or crazy making, is a symptom of systemic deception. And the felt need of the government to prospectively combat disinformation suggests it intended to deceive.
Psychopaths don't want trust. They want mechanistic obedience. They break up all patterns of logic and periodicity and expectation and anticipation. Rules change constantly, and each new rule must be obeyed instantly, for an unknown period until the next rule stomps down. There are no facts, only commands.
If the regime says that vaccines cause spoons to stick to arms, then they cause spoons to stick to arms. 2 plus 2 is 5, and if you think otherwise you are as insane as Winston and we must fix you.