Yet, I can't decide whether 1) I like your analysis b/c the data tend to prove what I already know or 2) I hate your analysis because the data you analyze are "immaterial," as we lawyers say of facts that have no bearing on the outcome af an adjudicated matter.
The reason the Left abhors and fights to the death to oppose objectivity, adores and fights to the death to impose "equity" and NEVER "follows the science" or the stats or the math or the biology or the physics or the chemistry or the ecology or the meteorolgy or the epidemiology or the engineering or the technology or the economics or any other objectively measurable, replicatable, verifiable, reliable basis or standard or criteria for measuring performance, making decisions and rendering predictions is because these grounds of objectivity, with irrefutable, undeniable certitude, undermine, weaken, disprove and defeat the rationality, sanity, benefit and morality of EVERYTHING the Left has malevolently achieved and everyhting the Left hopes seditiously to achieve by way of subverting the constitution, laws, and institutions of our country; wrecking its foundation, weakening its defenses, poisoning its culture, enfeebling its people, empowering and inciting its enemies, and destroying its prospects.
It occurs to me that I may have created the false impression that I regard Briggs' analysis as "immaterial" to the matter of whether the laws and institutions of American society discriminate in favor of black people. To the contrary, Briggs' anaysis is an excellent explication of just some of the data which support that conclusion. My intention was to state that Briggs' analysis is "immaterial" to the ultimate resolution of that matter, because the powers that decide such matters, the Left and its political patron, the Democrat Party, are wholly indifferent to what the data clearly show. Their behavior will not be affected by the analysis of that data. To the ultimte decision makers, the analysis and the data are "immaterial."
It's not just SF, I'm afraid. And it's not just HS. My cousin recently graduated from a dental hygiene program and told me that two students --both BIPOC--failed classes but advanced, nonetheless, to the next level with the other students. What's the point of even having classes, then?
When people catch on, Asian and white professionals will be very, very busy compared to their colleagues of color (COC?). This, of course, will be further proof of systemic racism.
Hoorah!
Yet, I can't decide whether 1) I like your analysis b/c the data tend to prove what I already know or 2) I hate your analysis because the data you analyze are "immaterial," as we lawyers say of facts that have no bearing on the outcome af an adjudicated matter.
The reason the Left abhors and fights to the death to oppose objectivity, adores and fights to the death to impose "equity" and NEVER "follows the science" or the stats or the math or the biology or the physics or the chemistry or the ecology or the meteorolgy or the epidemiology or the engineering or the technology or the economics or any other objectively measurable, replicatable, verifiable, reliable basis or standard or criteria for measuring performance, making decisions and rendering predictions is because these grounds of objectivity, with irrefutable, undeniable certitude, undermine, weaken, disprove and defeat the rationality, sanity, benefit and morality of EVERYTHING the Left has malevolently achieved and everyhting the Left hopes seditiously to achieve by way of subverting the constitution, laws, and institutions of our country; wrecking its foundation, weakening its defenses, poisoning its culture, enfeebling its people, empowering and inciting its enemies, and destroying its prospects.
It occurs to me that I may have created the false impression that I regard Briggs' analysis as "immaterial" to the matter of whether the laws and institutions of American society discriminate in favor of black people. To the contrary, Briggs' anaysis is an excellent explication of just some of the data which support that conclusion. My intention was to state that Briggs' analysis is "immaterial" to the ultimate resolution of that matter, because the powers that decide such matters, the Left and its political patron, the Democrat Party, are wholly indifferent to what the data clearly show. Their behavior will not be affected by the analysis of that data. To the ultimte decision makers, the analysis and the data are "immaterial."
It's not just SF, I'm afraid. And it's not just HS. My cousin recently graduated from a dental hygiene program and told me that two students --both BIPOC--failed classes but advanced, nonetheless, to the next level with the other students. What's the point of even having classes, then?
When people catch on, Asian and white professionals will be very, very busy compared to their colleagues of color (COC?). This, of course, will be further proof of systemic racism.
I'm stealing "COC".