Harris, in a televised debate, spouted numerous outrageous lies -disinformation. The moderators in that same debate allowed those lies to go unchallenged -accomplices. Hillary, Obama & Biden knowingly allowed the country to pursue the lie of Russia Gate -disinformation. The Democrats knowingly lied about the riot at the Capital -disinformation. The list goes on, and on..
This latest ploy by the Democrats to come after disinformation is nothing more than another projection... If you want to know what they're either up to, or planning, look always at what they accuse their opponents of doing. Why do they do this?
They are disciples of this man:
“Accuse your opponent of what you are doing, to create confusion and to inculcate voters against evidence of your own guilt" -Saul Alinsky, Rules for Radicals.
Having never been a tram player, I am astonished at the volume of broadcast verbiage in this age and the seeming requirement of "choosing" a side. What ever became of the discretion of keeping one's mouth shut and one's thoughts to one's self?
The Democrats and the media are so unmoored from reality that whoever opposes them is the side I choose. Keeping silent in the face of these lies allows them to go unchallenged and to spread like poison.
A big part of the ongoing psyop is to make people feel isolated and outliers. Speaking out allows others to know that they are not alone.
Political correctness self-censors people and labels pattern-noticers as racists and antisemites. It was a powerful tool that is losing its effectiveness. Hence the move to actual censorship of bad ideas.
All that you write is true, however, I think an extrovert is trying to convince an introvert to live against their character. I have never felt isolated nor have I needed to state or argue my stance on this so-called reality. I live by example and whether stranger or familiar, all know exactly where I stand.
But I do say Hurrah to the extroverts in this world for making a big stink.
Briggs, I like what Rippetoe defines "pseudoscience" as, paraphrasing,
"A statement, pronouncement, area of inquiry, etc., made authoritatively and couched in conventional scientific language that is both non-predictive and non-refutable, the later via typical argumentative and investigative methods."
I would support legislation that required fines and jail time for any current or retired government official or bureaucrat that perpetuated an “Official Truth” that proved to be misinformation or disinformation. Start with Fauci and the 51 ex-intelligence officials that lied about Hunter’s laptop.
“omertà” — a code of silence practiced by the Mafia; a rule or code that prohibits speaking or divulging information about certain activities, especially the activities of a criminal organization.
One thing that we need to recognize is that their pedantic word salad of mis/dis/ mal information is a word salad trap. Things are false, inaccurate or a lie. They start the Hegelian Dialectic word salad with requiring us to look up their malformed definitions, and that is the first step to diverting our minds.
That is how they co-opt vocabulary which is how they how they have achieved so much. Control the vocab, you control the mind. And it places them in the seat of being sole arbiter.
I'm increasingly a fan of Roman law and its support for personal responsibility; to wit, 'caveat emptor' - buyer beware. Opposing viewpoints should have free airing without any government or self-anointed experts interfering. After all, the Truth, whatever it is, is inviolable.
"Without are dogs, and sorcerers, and unchaste, and murderers, and servers of idols, and every one that loveth and maketh a lie" — Apocalypse (Revelation) 22:15
There are NO SUCH THINGS as misinformation, disinformation, or malinformation. To agree that these terms/words exist is to have already lost the battle of freedom of expression. The Regime will ALWAYS be the final arbiter of whether someone is guilty of the crime of mis- mal- or disinformation. Thus, freedom will always lose.
There is ONLY information that I choose - as is my inalienable right bestowed upon me by my Creator - to either accept or reject. No one, and no Regime, ever has any authority to remove that right, nor pass or enforce any laws restricting or eliminating that right. I, alone, decide what information I accept or reject.
I do not now, nor will I ever, recognize any human authority that seeks to remove my right to decide for myself what information I accept or reject.
Why is having people talking a problem?
The only thing I can come up is that only criminals running a swindle are worried about people talking.
Harris, in a televised debate, spouted numerous outrageous lies -disinformation. The moderators in that same debate allowed those lies to go unchallenged -accomplices. Hillary, Obama & Biden knowingly allowed the country to pursue the lie of Russia Gate -disinformation. The Democrats knowingly lied about the riot at the Capital -disinformation. The list goes on, and on..
This latest ploy by the Democrats to come after disinformation is nothing more than another projection... If you want to know what they're either up to, or planning, look always at what they accuse their opponents of doing. Why do they do this?
They are disciples of this man:
“Accuse your opponent of what you are doing, to create confusion and to inculcate voters against evidence of your own guilt" -Saul Alinsky, Rules for Radicals.
Agree! I went back and watched a replay of the debate, and here’s my analysis…
https://open.substack.com/pub/rogeralexander/p/kayfabe?r=23kjej&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
Whatever the Left says, whoever supports them, I'm against. Fkn lock me up. These people are deranged murderers. May they face justice one day.
Nullius in verba: “Take nobody’s word for it.”
- Motto of The Royal Society
Having never been a tram player, I am astonished at the volume of broadcast verbiage in this age and the seeming requirement of "choosing" a side. What ever became of the discretion of keeping one's mouth shut and one's thoughts to one's self?
The Democrats and the media are so unmoored from reality that whoever opposes them is the side I choose. Keeping silent in the face of these lies allows them to go unchallenged and to spread like poison.
Non-compliance is as effective in silence as it is when shouting.
A big part of the ongoing psyop is to make people feel isolated and outliers. Speaking out allows others to know that they are not alone.
Political correctness self-censors people and labels pattern-noticers as racists and antisemites. It was a powerful tool that is losing its effectiveness. Hence the move to actual censorship of bad ideas.
All that you write is true, however, I think an extrovert is trying to convince an introvert to live against their character. I have never felt isolated nor have I needed to state or argue my stance on this so-called reality. I live by example and whether stranger or familiar, all know exactly where I stand.
But I do say Hurrah to the extroverts in this world for making a big stink.
Greetings, fellow introvert!
I understand exactly what you're saying and absolutely do not wish to force anything on you.
For me, I just feel called to break against my nature and force this issue.
Peace to you, Gwyneth.
Perhaps this is the difference between a man and a woman. And I say, "Vive la difference!"
P. S. Although, it did seem to work for Mahatma Ghandi.
S/B team player.
Briggs, I like what Rippetoe defines "pseudoscience" as, paraphrasing,
"A statement, pronouncement, area of inquiry, etc., made authoritatively and couched in conventional scientific language that is both non-predictive and non-refutable, the later via typical argumentative and investigative methods."
And of course as any and all laws cannot be enforced equally, those laws based on the subjectivity of the state will be enforced most unequally.
This is a “feature” and not a “bug” in the eyes of the Regime.
I would support legislation that required fines and jail time for any current or retired government official or bureaucrat that perpetuated an “Official Truth” that proved to be misinformation or disinformation. Start with Fauci and the 51 ex-intelligence officials that lied about Hunter’s laptop.
“omertà” — a code of silence practiced by the Mafia; a rule or code that prohibits speaking or divulging information about certain activities, especially the activities of a criminal organization.
One thing that we need to recognize is that their pedantic word salad of mis/dis/ mal information is a word salad trap. Things are false, inaccurate or a lie. They start the Hegelian Dialectic word salad with requiring us to look up their malformed definitions, and that is the first step to diverting our minds.
That is how they co-opt vocabulary which is how they how they have achieved so much. Control the vocab, you control the mind. And it places them in the seat of being sole arbiter.
Is there any news on Consitutional challenges to Newsom's idiocy?
Even at the State level I understand California has a Constitution that is fairly liberal in the older sense of that term. No?
There's always the San Andreas Fault.
They should rename it to "It's Newsome's Fault".
A Geo-logical challenge.
I'm increasingly a fan of Roman law and its support for personal responsibility; to wit, 'caveat emptor' - buyer beware. Opposing viewpoints should have free airing without any government or self-anointed experts interfering. After all, the Truth, whatever it is, is inviolable.
"Without are dogs, and sorcerers, and unchaste, and murderers, and servers of idols, and every one that loveth and maketh a lie" — Apocalypse (Revelation) 22:15
“A new law in Scotland threatens you with seven years in JAIL if you misgender someone.”
How many years for parents who refuse transition treatment for their children?
That's next level misgendering. They should be looking at FOURTEEN years, minimum.
>>> "actual lie" <<<
I understand the adjective in the context, but still I feel dizzy.
This is like trying to follow a table tennis match.
There are NO SUCH THINGS as misinformation, disinformation, or malinformation. To agree that these terms/words exist is to have already lost the battle of freedom of expression. The Regime will ALWAYS be the final arbiter of whether someone is guilty of the crime of mis- mal- or disinformation. Thus, freedom will always lose.
There is ONLY information that I choose - as is my inalienable right bestowed upon me by my Creator - to either accept or reject. No one, and no Regime, ever has any authority to remove that right, nor pass or enforce any laws restricting or eliminating that right. I, alone, decide what information I accept or reject.
I do not now, nor will I ever, recognize any human authority that seeks to remove my right to decide for myself what information I accept or reject.