I got to Hillsdale a day early and took an amble about campus. Ended up in the library—called, oddly, a “library” and not the more sophisticated “learning center”—where I saw the strangest sight. A sight that if you have any experience with modern universities will sound unbelievable, but I swear it is true.
Students were sitting quietly reading.
I know, I know. But I promise I saw this. Not only were they reading, but they were reading books. Real books. Physical books. The kind with pages you have to turn. Not on screens.
This puzzled me greatly, and I yearned to know the reason. But it was so quiet that I dared not ask any student to explain their curious behavior.
Our host threw we Broken Science Initiative people a lovely dinner out on his farm. I envied him his barn. I have always wanted a barn. I do not have one. I want one.
On the day of the event, the new head of Hillsdale’s Academy for Science and Freedom took me to lunch to meet some of the faculty who were long-time blog readers, and some students. The topic of conversation was, of course, the mania for “The Science”, especially during the covid panic. Which again, believe it or not, Hillsdale did not do. Panic, I mean.
Incidentally, I neglected to ask anybody I met whether I could “out” them on the blog, which is why I am not naming names. People have enough trouble these days without having to defend associating with a known Thought Criminal like myself.
The night of the speech was classy. Hillsdale laid out savories and two open bars. Before dinner. Dinner itself was brisket—not chicken! Good wine, too. And a reception after the event. There were some 400+ people: many, many tables.
People came from all over, many driving great distances. Which is cheering. Not for me, because few attending knew Greg and me, but for all of us. Figure this: the talk title “Philosophy of Science”. Under, of course, the auspices of the BSI and Hillsdale. But who in the world drives hundreds of miles to hear two talks on the philosophy of science?
Well, many. Which means, just like you, dear reader, people are sick of, or at least suspicious about, the state of science, and most especially of “The Science”. They wanted to hear why they’re being beaten up by so much “The Science”.
Greg and I told them.
Greg Glassman led off with a speech on the Broken Science Initiative itself. He told his terrific nails story (which I’ve related here before), which always grabs the audience. Not all science is bad or broken, he emphasized, but much is, and the reasons for this are not far to seek. Bad philosophy.
Jeff Glassman, Greg’s dad, taught him the important of predictability. If a scientific theory, or model, cannot make verifiable useful predictions, then it has no value. He also has a book which you should know about, but which is hard to find, and is out of print. Evolution in Science, which should be mandatory reading for those designing science curricula.
My talk emphasized that all the best people—all big names, well in with the leading organizations—all say science is broken. I then give the top 7 reasons science goes bad because of bad philosophy. You’ll see these soon.
I even quoted from our old favorite, Old Hoss herself, Sabine “Yeehaw!” Hossenfelder, who took to The Guardian last year to complain that the dozens of New & Improved particles scientists keep proposing never turn out to be real.
A physicist asked me about this, wondering if this isn’t how science is supposed to work. After all, he said, think about the Higgs boson, which was recently confirmed. In my answer, I stupidly failed to emphasize a crucial important difference between the Higgs and the Failed Zoo: the Higgs was predicted by the model, and all those other non-existent particles were not. They were instead overly enthusiastic attempts at fitting statistical anomalies.
I did say that physics is at least one up on most other fields, because they didn’t just stop at proposing new particles, but they went and tested for them again later. That’s the right thing to do.
The majority of models proposed in the literature are never tested. That’s why we have the replication crisis.
The videos, they say, will be up soon. When they are, I’ll feature them in a post. They do not duplicate the material from the Phoenix BSI event. So if you haven’t seen those videos, now’s the time.
Subscribe or donate to support this site and its wholly independent host using credit card click here. Or use the paid subscription here. For Zelle, use my email: matt@wmbriggs.com, and please include yours so I know who to thank.
Jugum enim meum suave est et onus meum leve
I was thinking how good it to believe in God to explain why Science is broken.
I have read other professors saying also that science is broken. But they are very bitter people. I think their bitterness stems directly from their atheism. They are very confused because they say the problems of science come from unlearned people, such as myself, speaking without knowledge in the internet, without respect to authority. Authority that lies, because it is a slave of Power.
Which amounts to say that science and culture and society is broken because there is too much freedom everywhere, everything is too cheap, there is too much capitalism and no central organization of anything. Absurd!
Bitter atheists tend to be authoritarian socialists.
The truth is they refuse to accept the obvious fact that the problems of science are caused by scientists acting like idiots, allowing politicians to corrupt everything by setting up ideology traps everywhere, among other things.
We the hoi polloi are innocent bystanders in the planned chaos that the authoritarian academics will never acknowledge.
This is because the Academics started selling out decades ago for less than one morsel of food.
Scientists need freedom. The public is irrelevant.
To get freedom for scientific work, scientists should first go to God and ask for freedom in their souls. Power does not want scientists or anyone else to have any kind of freedom. That's where modern ignorance comes from.
I almost bought a barn. It came with a house. But even though it might’ve been the largest barn in the county, I resisted. It would’ve required the full time attention of an Amish crew to make it completely serviceable, and the Amish know their value. Fond memories. I would like to see more classic barn building - country cathedrals.